Outperform your stats. Get into your dream law school.

Emily personally handles your strategy — school list, narrative direction, scholarship leverage, and cycle-level decisions. The editorial review of every document is handled by a reviewer from our team who is matched to your target schools. Every assigned reviewer has either been admitted to one or more of your target schools, previously worked in admissions at one of your targets, or has a documented track record of placing previous clients at those schools.

After your intake call with Emily, we match you with the reviewer on our team whose credentials and track record map most directly to your school list. If your list is T3-heavy, you get a reviewer with current T3 experience. If you're applying as a career switcher to a specific regional powerhouse, you get a reviewer with direct editorial or admissions experience at that type of program. The match happens before any drafting starts, so the person reading your work already understands how to get you in.

The full application package is $2,000 flat. That covers unlimited edits on your personal statement, full review of diversity statement and every supplemental, résumé rebuild, recommender strategy, school list build, and scholarship negotiation support. No hourly rates. No surprise add-ons.

If you want a senior read before committing to the full engagement, the $500 60-minute strategy call with Emily is the right entry point. If you upgrade to the full package within 30 days, the $500 is credited in full toward the $2,000.

Yes — and you're exactly who we built this for. Our team's specialty is applicants who outperform their stats. We have a documented track record of admits to top 14 programs — frequently with merit aid — at schools where the applicant's GPA or LSAT sat below the median. We cannot manufacture a story that isn't there. What we can do is find the story that is and frame it so a committee can't put it down.

You can, and thousands of applicants do every year. It's why the average personal statement reads like a LinkedIn summary about "my passion for justice." Committees spot AI-edited work in seconds. Reddit is a firehose of confidently-wrong opinions from people who have not themselves been admitted. We are not anti-AI — but using it well requires knowing what committees actually read for. That knowledge costs either years of trial and error or one well-run cycle with people who have done it.

Expect 4–8 hours per week during active drafting phases, and 1–2 hours per week during strategy phases. We've run this alongside full-time jobs, senior years at demanding undergrads, post-bacc programs, and international relocations. The structure is what makes the time manageable — you will never be staring at a blank document wondering what to do next.

For next cycle: June is ideal. July–August is strong. September is still workable. October onward, we're operating in triage mode. For this cycle: if you haven't submitted, we can still help — we've built applications in three weeks that earned T14 admits. Later-cycle candidates get a compressed but full version of the package.

Then that's enough. Many applicants book the call, get their game plan, and run the rest of their cycle themselves. If that's you, great — no one will push you into the full package. If after the call you realize you want the editorial firepower of the full engagement, the $500 gets credited toward the $2,000 if you upgrade within 30 days.